[NIFL-4EFF:2991] Re: Effective pedagogy in teaching

From: MWPotts2001@aol.com
Date: Wed Apr 20 2005 - 18:07:42 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j3KM7gG19700; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:07:42 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:07:42 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <a3.72197426.2f982c11@aol.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: MWPotts2001@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-4eff@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-4EFF:2991] Re: Effective pedagogy in teaching
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 1200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Status: O
Content-Length: 4394
Lines: 84

Colleagues,

Dr. Alba asked about the most  effective teaching strategies for the pre and 
GED student.  Thanks to Sarah  and Carolyn for reminding us of the importance 
of direct/explicit instruction to  readers at all levels.

My I add a couple of things about effective  pedagogy in teaching:

First, I'm sure that you are aware, Dr. Alba, that  students who are 
struggling in the lower levels of reading, i.e., their  knowledge, skills, and 
abilities are not as developed as those in the higher  levels) are still learning to 
read.

Once they acquire a stronger skills  set, they are able to read to learn. 
When students are able to read to learn,  they have the ability to construct and 
explicitly show knowledge. Besides the  simple mind maps that you mentioned, 
there are many more complex visuals  (task-specific organizers for 
individualized and cooperative learning.) I urge  you to investigate these tools.

Secondly, I am pointing out an article  written about teaching reading to 
adolescents in the American School Board  Journal, April 2005.  The reading 
abilities of GED students may, in fact,  mirror some of the abilities of adolescent 
readers.  Here are some  suggestions from that article:

Tackling the problem

It’s possible  to raise middle school and high school students’ overall 
literacy, including  reading comprehension, Snow and Biancarosa contend. But to do 
so, schools must  have the will and persistence to make literacy the 
cornerstone of learning.  
In Reading Next, a 2004 report from the Carnegie Corp. of New York and AEE,  
Snow and Biancarosa recommend the following classroom-based strategies to  
improve adolescent literacy:
• Provide direct, explicit instruction in  reading comprehension, such as 
summarizing and discussing texts with others.  
• Teach students reading and writing skills specific to subjects such as  
science and math.
• Motivate students to become self-directed and independent  readers.
• Encourage students to work collaboratively, using text materials  at 
different levels and on a variety of topics.
• Individualize reading,  writing, and content instruction for students who 
need extra help.
• Include  more writing in daily lessons.
• Add technology, such as well-designed  computer tutorials, to help 
struggling readers.
• Assess students  continuously and use information to monitor and adjust 
lessons and  assignments.
• Infuse literacy development into all classes, not only English  and 
language arts.
• Train teachers to teach literacy development well.
•  Use data to inform literacy policies and practices.
• Organize  interdisciplinary teacher teams that focus on literacy in daily  
lessons.
High-performing middle and high schools that succeed in teaching  students to 
read and write well “weave a web of connections” that support  literacy, 
says Judith Langer, director of the National Research Center on  English Learning 
& Achievement based at the State University of New York at  Albany.
Langer’s five-year study of English programs, conducted in 44  classrooms in 
25 schools in four states, discovered major differences between  effective 
adolescent literacy programs and ineffective ones. Highly successful  programs, 
Langer found, practice six instructional practices concurrently and  
consistently:
1. Teach students using a variety of activities, including  independent 
lessons, exercises, and drills; lessons involving reading and  writing about new 
concepts and information; and lessons in which students apply  new learning in 
class discussions.
2. Prepare students for tests by  emphasizing the knowledge on which they’ll 
be assessed, and integrate test  preparation into daily lessons instead of 
giving students separate drills.  
3. Incorporate students’ real-life experiences both in and out of school  
into daily lessons.
4. Give students critical reading and writing strategies  they need to 
succeed on daily lessons and homework assignments. 
5. Provide  time for students to read broadly on topics of interest, explore 
texts from many  points of view, and conduct their own research.
6. Foster collaborative  learning by placing students in well-chosen groups. 
Prompt students to raise  questions, discuss ideas, and “bump minds” with one 
another.

All the  Best,

Meta Potts, Moderator 4-EFF List
Glen Allen, Va  



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:48:22 EST