[NIFL-POVRACELIT:1511] NIFL-Assessment List Discussion on Measuring Literacy

From: Mary Ann Corley (macorley1@earthlink.net)
Date: Wed Jun 15 2005 - 15:42:44 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j5FJgiG09287; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:42:44 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:42:44 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <001601c571e2$57e41480$01cbb3d1@air.org>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Mary Ann  Corley" <macorley1@earthlink.net>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-POVRACELIT:1511] NIFL-Assessment List Discussion on Measuring Literacy
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
Status: O
Content-Length: 3460
Lines: 86

The Assessment list moderator has asked that I post the following
information about a
discussion that will be occurring soon on that list. You may find this
discussion of interest. To
subscribe to the Assessment list, go to:
http://www.nifl.gov/lincs/discussions/nifl-assessment/assessment.html
and click on Subscribe in the left toolbar (you must also unsubscribe
yourself).

-Mary Ann Corley

*****************

Please join the NIFL-Assessment Discussion List for a conversation on
Measuring Literacy:  Performance Levels for Adults, Interim Report (2005)

Date:  June 20 - 24

Principle Guests:   Judy Koenig and Stuart Elliot, Project Directors

The Full Committee will also be joining us as observers; their comments and
insights are welcomed.

Full Committee Members:

Chris Edley, University of California at Berkeley, School of Law Bob Hauser,
University of Wisconsin at Madison Judy Alamprese, ABT Associates, USA
Michael Delli Carpini, University of Pennsylvania Vivian Gadsden, University
of Pennsylvania Andy Hartman, Classroom Teacher, formerly with Bell Policy
Center Glynda Hull, University of California at Berkeley Rebecca Maynard,
University of Pennsylvania Lorraine McDonnell, National Academy of Sciences,
Washington DC Larry Mikulecky, Indiana University Bob Mislevy, University of
Maryland Norm Peterson, SPR Center, Minneapolis John Poggio, University of
Kansas Rima Rudd, Harvard University Mary Jane Schmitt, TERC, Cambridge, MA
Heide Wrigley, Aguirre International, CA and Washington DC Dave Thissen,
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Suggested preparations for this discussion:

This Interim Report can be read on-line at:
http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11267.html

Our discussion guests are interested in sharing their thoughts on the
Interim Report, providing clarification to the field on information
contained in the Report, and entertaining your questions and comments,
particularly in the following areas:

* Questions concerning the lowest and the highest categories of
the literacy levels; specifically, questions concerning the difference
between the Non-Literacy in English and Below Basic categories, and
comparing the percentages of folks falling within these categories between
the 1992 survey and the 2003 survey;

* An explanation of the Bookmark Standard-Setting Procedure that
was utilized in the study;

* An explanation of the Quasi Contrasting Groups Procedure, that
was utilized to adjust the cut scores;

* Why the Committee chose not to determine a level of performance
as "necessary" or "sufficient" for effectively functioning in life; as an
example of this, note that the terms used to label the levels are purely
descriptive, rather than indicating a particular judgment about that level;

* An explanation of how the Committee's process differed from the
original process for determining the levels and cut scores for the 1992
results;

* The recommendations that the Committee puts forth based on its
research.

Please note that the Final Report is due out in the Fall of this year; the
differences between the Interim and Final Reports will be

* the application of the performance levels and cut scores to the
2003 data, and
* the reporting of the percentages of adults in each level based
on the 2003 results.

Please join us!

marie cora
Moderator, NIFL Assessment Discussion List, and Coordinator/Developer LINCS
Assessment Special Collection at
http://literacy.kent.edu/Midwest/assessment/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:49:59 EST